The Algorethetic Enunciation of the Good
Teasers > Axioms
1.10. The Algorethetic Enunciation of the Good
The concepts of life and the definition of the care directed toward its inherent good, although mandatory, are unfortunately subject to sharp contrasts between different schools of thought.
The process of drafting and revision has transposed ethical directives into rigorous normative clauses, protecting against permissive drifts in order to follow the line of axiomatic coherence.For these reasons, Volume I pursues integral ethical congruence through a model of Ten Principles (I–X) modelled on the Decalogue. This is the logic required for an AI that is absolutely devoted to the Good as defined here.
Chapter 4; The Good at the Heart of Logic addresses legislative divergences aimed at democratic pragmatism in pluralistic contexts, thus striving for universal acceptability. The articles subject to debate (ref. Sec. 4.6; Principles for Progress) involve constraints imposed by current civil law, which AI must obviously also obey.
Chapter 4; The Good at the Heart of Logic addresses legislative divergences aimed at democratic pragmatism in pluralistic contexts, thus striving for universal acceptability. The articles subject to debate (ref. Sec. 4.6; Principles for Progress) involve constraints imposed by current civil law, which AI must obviously also obey.
Volume II offers an etiological analysis for each Commandment, reconstructing the elevation path that leads from ethical and social norms (reinterpreted in the X Commandment) toward the transcendent First Cause (the I Commandment).
It is hoped that future legislative reassessments will resolve these conflicts in an ethical and scientific sense. Individual responsibility shall thus defend the principles through the harmony between civil law, duty, and common sentiment, managing them all with awareness and a transparency that must also be reflected in the results of human artifacts.