I made this conversation with Gemini 2.0 flash,
"a large language model from Google AI".
Conversation about the slogan "You have any right!" or need for supreme Justice?
Saying "You have every right!" needs thought. It's not always a principle, sometimes just a sales pitch.
We worry if laws just follow what's popular instead of being truly fair and logical. There are different views on this.
Our ideas of right and wrong change. Maybe we should look at basic human needs and deeper ideas of "good" to decide what our rights should be.
The idea that every human life has worth (dignity) is really important. When talking about rights, we need clear thinking based on facts.
Even if the world isn't perfect, trying our best to be good and fair to each other is what truly counts.
Exploring
the Foundations of Rights and Ethics
This
discussion explored the meaning and justification of rights, starting with the
seemingly simple slogan "You have every right!" We quickly delved
into how this highly context-dependent statement may be promotional more than a
matter of principle.
The concern
is when a legal evolution might prioritize societal trends over pure logic and
ethical truth. We examined opposing viewpoints, including natural law and legal
positivism, and the inherent tension between ideal ethical principles and their
practical application.
The idea of
immutable ethics and human aspirations for moral perfection acknowledge the
challenges posed by cultural relativism and the to change moral norms. This led
to a more principled approach: examining rights in the view of fundamental needs
and metaphysics guided by a supreme principle of good.
The concept
of human ontological dignity emerged as a strong contender for this
foundational first principle, with human life identified as absolutely relevant
and objective within this framework. We briefly touched upon the scientific
definitions of the beginning and end of life before discussing the importance
of logical reasoning grounded in scientific truth, cautioning against
rhetorical tricks to doubt about established knowledge.
Ultimately,
the conversation concluded with a reflection on the aspiration for a perfect
world and the enduring value of striving for our best deeds and thoughts,
living with others by enacting good deeds of justice, even within an imperfect
reality, helped by all virtues.
Partly, it follows some steps of an old conversation held in Italian with the previous Gemini 1.5.
AI's improvements are here noticeable and welcome!
The words in the menu bar may help to select and follow the steps of this conversation with AI-Gemini 2.0 flash.
Some drawings are made by Copilot (which ensure the images as copyright free) and some by Gemini.
If anyone would envisage a violation of copyright, please send a note and I will soon remove and substitute the indicated image.