erosion of ethics, examples

Are any extreme individual rights nowadays promoted inside the western culture

with such erosion of ethics and silencing of oppositions?

What would you discuss, for example?

The reply by Gemini:

Ideological narratives erode Ethics and influence people by ambiguity, uncertainty, and force

Yes, there are contemporary examples within Western culture where the promotion of what can be argued as extreme individual rights occurs alongside an erosion of traditional ethics and the silencing of opposing viewpoints. These are often complex and highly debated issues, but here's an example we can discuss:

The Expansion of Unfettered Personal Autonomy in Certain Bioethical Debates:

The "My Body, My Choice" Argument Extended: The principle of bodily autonomy, central to many individual rights discussions, is being extended in some circles to encompass choices that have significant ethical implications and potential societal consequences, sometimes with limited room for dissenting ethical viewpoints.

Example: Consider the ongoing debates surrounding issues like physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia, and to some extent, the more radical interpretations of gender-affirming care for minors. Proponents often frame these as fundamental rights of self-determination and personal autonomy, arguing that individuals have the ultimate say over their bodies and lives, free from external interference or traditional moral constraints.

Erosion of Traditional Ethics: In these debates, traditional ethical frameworks that emphasize the sanctity of life, the importance of parental responsibility, or the potential long-term consequences of certain medical interventions can be downplayed or dismissed as outdated or infringing upon individual liberty.
Silencing of Oppositions: Those who raise ethical concerns rooted in these traditional frameworks – for instance, regarding the potential for abuse in assisted suicide, the long-term psychological impacts of irreversible medical interventions on minors, or the role of parental guidance – can face accusations of being bigoted, uncompassionate, or anti-progress. This can create a chilling effect on open and nuanced discussion.
Framing as a Fundamental Right: The desired outcome (e.g., access to assisted suicide or specific medical interventions) is often framed as a fundamental right that the state or society is obligated to provide or at least not impede. This framing can bypass broader ethical considerations about the role of the medical profession, societal values around life and death, or the well-being of vulnerable individuals.

Points for Discussion:

The Limits of Autonomy: Where should the boundaries of personal autonomy lie when individual choices have profound ethical and societal implications? Is absolute self-determination always the ultimate principle?
The Role of Ethics in a Liberal Society: How do we balance individual rights with a shared ethical framework that promotes the common good and protects vulnerable individuals? Can a society thrive without some level of shared moral understanding?
The Nature of "Rights": What constitutes a fundamental right? Should desires or preferences be automatically elevated to the status of rights, or should there be a broader societal and ethical evaluation?
The Importance of Open Discourse: How can we foster respectful and open dialogue on these complex issues, ensuring that diverse ethical perspectives are heard and considered without fear of being silenced or stigmatized?
Potential Harms: What are the potential harms to individuals and society when extreme interpretations of individual rights overshadow ethical considerations and suppress dissenting voices?

This example illustrates how the promotion of an extreme interpretation of individual autonomy in certain bioethical areas can be seen as aligning with your description of eroding ethics and silencing opposition in contemporary Western culture. It's a complex issue with deeply held beliefs on all sides, making open and respectful dialogue crucial.